|
NFU Refuses
to Use £30m to Aid Farmers
Suspicions have
been confirmed that the National Farmers' Union, rather than serving the
interests of the farmers have other vested interests. Their major investments
in Tesco, Barclays Bank and the American GM giant Monsanto are inevitably
a major conflict of interest bordering on corruption. Tesco claims that its
£1bn profit was not off the back of farmers. It was claimed that their
success was due to cutting prices against competitors whilst maintaining
margin! Dissatisfaction with the NFU has long been widespread among farmers,
and the manner in which they have behaved over the FMD crisis has been scandalous.
While Farmers for Action, the grassroots movement which has given farmers
so much cause for hope, was negotiating for higher milk prices with company
traders, NFU president Ben Gill was having lunch with Terry Leaky!
The National
Farmers' Union is refusing to offer financial support to its members despite
amassing stock market investments worth more than £30 million. Among
the union's investments are holdings in firms experimenting with genetically
modified food, as well as supermarkets and banks that have been criticised
for putting farmers out of business.
'Aid for
farmers a matter for the government'
The NFU insisted
that aid for farmers hit by foot-and-mouth was a matter for the Government.
Michael Lambert, the union's treasurer, said: "We are a membership organisation
and we use our money to lobby the Government to ensure farmers are properly
compensated." If assets were used to assist farmers "we would have to raise
our members' subscriptions or reduce the services to an unacceptable level",
he said. John Edmonds, general secretary of the GMB trade union, said: "The
hypocrisy of the NFU is staggering. At the same time as they attack the Government
for not doing enough to bail out farmers they are refusing to spend a penny
of their own money." Other unions regularly use financial reserves to assist
members, not least during industrial action. Mr Edmonds said "the NFU is
a union in name only".
NFU invests
in GM food, banks and supermarkets
In October last
year the NFU filed financial returns with the official Certification Office
showing that it had quoted investments of £30,880,000. Among the union's
investments are holdings worth hundreds of thousands of pounds in five drug
and bioscience companies experimenting with genetically modified products,
including the American GM giant Monsanto. The NFU has also bought a substantial
number of shares in Tesco, the supermarket chain that it has accused of profiteering,
and about £168,000 in Barclays Bank, which was accused of abandoning
rural Britain last year when it shut down a large number of village branches.
Mr Lambert defended the choice of stocks and shares. "It is a financial consideration:
these investments are done purely for the return that we get," he said. MPs
condemned the union for entering into investments that could compromise its
ability to speak freely on behalf of its members. It is difficult to see how
the NFU can speak freely about genetic modification while investing in companies
like Monsanto."
A senior Labour
MP with a partly rural constituency added: "Plenty of other organisations
have found that they can invest wisely but invest ethically, so why can't
the NFU? Why are they sitting on all this money at a time when the taxpayer
is handing over so much compensation to farmers who have lost their livestock?"
The NFU is in favour of controlled field trials on genetically modified crops,
although the leadership acknowledges that its membership is deeply divided
on the issue. Lawrence Wright, who has a 40-acre sheep farm near Ilfracombe,
Devon, where he produces organic cheese, said: "It's not in my interests and
I don't believe that it's in the interests of other small family farmers."
He believes that the NFU should be investing in local abattoirs and small
chains of butchers' and grocers' shops to help its members to sell their produce.
Source: The
Times, 1 May 2001
Who is The
NFU in Reality?
The present
system of voting for the NFU presidential team is conducted exclusively by
members of council, some of whom are co-opted members, some are ex-presidents
and some have never been voted on for years. These individuals hold the entire
and only possibility of changing the president of the NFU. The rest of the
membership, approximately 60,000, is effectively disenfranchised and totally
unable to influence the affairs or the direction of the NFU. Members are denied
the basic democratic right to vote for the presidential team of their organisation.
This makes the NFU as democratic as Stalin's Soviet Union and, apart from
that, the NFU's claim that it represents farmers is ridiculous. Only one
third of farmers are members of the NFU.
Source: www.sheepdrove.com
|