Peace is more than the absence of war
'The Secretary General, Bonabes de Rougé, had never abandoned his
commitment to peacetime work, wherever that was possible in a world at war. Now,
as the final Valhalla in Berlin led inexorably to the suicide of Hitler on 30
April 1945, and the surrender of German troops, de Rougé told staff that
the world had a chance of 'a new beginning'. His optimism was much diminished
when, on 6 and 9 August 1945, atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima und Nagasaki in
Japan - bringing the war in the Far East to an end, but at a terrifying human
cost. The Secretary General could do no more than endorse the statement of the
ICRC: 'Now that the utilisation of atomic energy has found its first application
in the creation of a weapon of inordinate destructive power, the development of
the technique of war, and therefore of war itself, seems to be clearly headed
for ... maximum extermination.' A similar theme was taken up in the first issue
of The Bulletin after the cease-fire in Europe, in an editorial headed Towards a
New Era: 'For the first time the terrifying formula of 'total war,' utterly
merciless, is being put into effect ...Women, old people, children, - all are
torn from their homes, sent into slavery, exposed to hideous suffering, or even
put to death.' Such horrors, the article continued, could only be avoided in
future if the men and women of the Red Cross movement realized that peace war
'more than the absence of war'.'
Beyond Conflict, p. 138
|