No 3, 2003
Current Concerns
P.O. box 223
CH-8044 Zurich
+41-44-350 65 50
Current Concerns - The monthly journal for independent thought, ethical standards and moral responsibility - English Edition of Zeit-Fragen
No 3, 2003
07 Feb 2012, 05:30 PM
current issue
archive
printer friendly version

The Neo-cons now want to „rebuild“ Iraq

by F. William Engdahl, Germany/USA [*]

Anti-terror Falcon becomes the Civil Administrator in Iraq

The Bush Administration has just announced that it has decided to name Ambassador L. Paul Bremer, former State Department official, to be overall civilian Administrator of Iraq. General Jay garner and the Pentagon staff will report to Ambassador Bremer. Far from a 'victory' of the Colin Powell faction over the Pentagon hawks, the naming of Bremer is a cynical ploy by the neo-conservative hawks to retain control of postwar Iraq reconstruction. Bremer is one of the most hawkish advocates of war in Iraq and the toppling of Saddam Hussein. He is a former State Department anti-terror expert in the 1980's, who later became managing director of Kissinger Associates of Henry Kissinger. Bremer is also one of the leading, if less well-known neo-cons. A close associate of Richard Perle, Bremer is a select member of the Americans for Victory over Terrorism, created by neo-con William Bennett, James Woolsey and others, to lobby on behalf of war against Iraq. In a January 2002 security conference with Richard Perle in Washington, Bremer openly called for Bush to 'finish the job we left unfinished in 1991, because Saddam Hussein still considers himself to be at war with us.'

The entire postwar reconstruction of Iraq as of this writing is in the hands of the neo-conservative hawks around US Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. The consequences for the future of not only the Middle east, but also of the entire postwar world are likely to be very bad.

Even before US Defense Secretary Rumsfeld declared “victory” in Iraq, the Washington neo-conservative hawk faction around Richard Perle and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz made clear just who will rule postwar Iraq. The arrogance of their actions is exceeded only by their boldness.

The postwar economic and humanitarian reconstruction of Iraq is not in the hands of the UN or even the US State Department’s Agency for International Development which, at least, has some semblance of experience in rebuilding war-torn regions with necessary water, electricity and medical services. Instead, Rumsfeld has managed a political coup, against the expressed wish of the US Congress, which appropriated some $2.5 billion to the State Department for Iraqi reconstruction. Rumsfeld has instead played on his “victor” role to convince the President to make the Pentagon the overlord of the Iraqi economy.

The man chosen to be new US pro-consul of the Iraq economy is a pro-Israel arms dealer and friend of the leading Washington neo-conservative think tank, JINSA. General Jay Garner (ret.) Jay Garner enjoys strong ties to the Israeli Likud Party of Ariel Sharon, and to the Israeli military industry, as well as to Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the Pentagon neo-cons. Garner’s ties to Israel are so well-known that the English-language Jewish Forward greeted his appointment by Rumsfeld with a headline, “Pro-Israeli general will oversee reconstruction of postwar Iraq.”

Garner, on leaving the Army in 1997, became president of SY Technology in California Today he remains President of SY Coleman, as it is now called, despite his Iraq post. At SY Coleman, Garner worked to provide technical support for the “smart bomb” and missile systems used in the Iraq war, and he worked with leading Israeli military contractors on Israel’s $2 billion Arrow missile defense program.

Garner is also close to the leading neo-con, pro-Likud think-tank in Washington, JINSA. This Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs includes top neo-conservatives such as Richard Perle, Michael Ledeen, ex-CIA head, James Woolsey on its board. Garner has signed JINSA Open Letter appeals, meaning he is openly known as an ally of the pro-Likud group, hardly a reassurance for Iraqis or for the Arab world looking for any sign of positive US intent in the postwar period.

Garner was named last January by Rumsfeld to head the Pentagon Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA). Garner’s ORHA is directly under the supervision of Pentagon Undersecretary for Defense Policy, Douglas Feith, a neo-conservative friend of Perle. Garner’s own deputy is Michael Mobbs, a former law partner and “special adviser” to Feith. Mobbs developed the theory that allowed the Defense Department to hold US citizens without trial or lawyer if deemed “enemy combatants.” Garner’s staff at ORHA also includes more than 100 “free Iraqis” selected by another dubious person backed by Pentagon neo-cons, Iraqi National Congress (INC) leader, Ahmed Chalabi. The Hawks around Wolfowitz hope quickly to “transfer” power from the US military in Iraq, from Garner and Tommy Franks, to an Iraqi provisional government led by Chalabi and his INC henchmen.

In early April, just hours before the Battle of Baghdad, the Pentagon flew Chalabi with 700 of his handpicked armed supporters, to the newly occupied city Nasiriyah in central Iraq. The State Department was reportedly “apoplectic” over the de facto Wolfowitz coup. The President has signalled that Rumsfeld is setting the agenda, at least now, for postwar Iraq.

Chalabi comes from a wealthy Iraqi family close to the deposed King Faisal II. He has lived in the USA and London in exile since 1958, most recently as head of the opposition Iraqi National Congress in London. But Chalabi is no ordinary Iraqi exile. He is a “neo-conservative Iraqi”, who has been close friends with Richard Perle since 1985. Before that, at the University of Chicago, Chalabi came under the influence of deceased Perle mentor and neo-conservative Albert Wohlstetter, who reportedly introduced Chalabi to the neo-conservative philosopher Leo Strauss. Chalabi is the neo-con’s man to head a post-Saddam Iraq.

Despite strong opposition from the US State Department against Chalabi, as well as from Tenet’s CIA, and most outside the US, Chalabi is backed by the Pentagon hawks around Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz. Chalabi, convicted in Jordan for bank fraud in 1989, is surrounded by allegations of self-enrichment and dubious dealings. Some in Washington allege that Chalabi gets money directly from Likud intelligence. Even if not proven, his intimate ties with pro-Likud neo-cons like Perle and Wolfowitz guarantee that, were Chalabi to be installed by the Pentagon as President of Iraq or anything close, it would detonate a backlash across the entire Arab world, starting with Iraq, where the Shi’ite-tied Chalabi is already mistrusted as a US pawn. Some point to the US backing for the corrupt but “anti-communist” regime of South Vietnam’s Ngo Dinh Diem in the 1960’s which required major US military protection to support, as the model for what a Chalabi-run Iraq might look like.

Alarmingly, this is just the direction Wolfowitz and the Pentagon hawks are pursuing. Jay Garner has named top Iraqi Chalabi associates to work side-by-side with US military figures, running every government ministry in postwar Iraq, “as a transition.” The key ministry, naturally, is the Iraqi Oil Ministry, which controls the vast oil resources of Iraq. On April 20, the London Financial Times reported that a mysterious new, Co-ordinating Committee for the Oil Industry had appeared in Baghdad, under an equally mysterious Fellah al-Khawaja. Investigation revealed that al-Khawaja was backed by Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress and, of course, by Jay Garner’s Pentagon, who is considering naming former US Shell oil executive, Philip Carroll to actually control the Iraq National Oil Company.

However, in order for the US to get the Iraq oil proceeds for Garner’s “reconstruction,” it needs to lift sanctions of the UN Security Council, something that gives France, China, and Russia a veto power. With no UN vote, the oil would be illegal and few traders would dare buy it. Chirac is hinting at possible yes vote to lift, but the battle is far from over, with EU countries and others demanding a role in the postwar reconstruction. Given the arrogance of the neo-conservatives now in charge in Iraq, it is unlikely that any but the close circle of “Pentagon friends” will get the plum contracts, potentially worth billions.

At this writing, much remains unclear over the future of Iraq. But one thing is clear. If Garner, Chalabi and the present neo-con cabal remain in control of Iraqi reconstruction, the gulf between the United States and the rest of the world will widen even more than it has to date. That, of course, will only create joy in neo-con circles.

* Author of Mit der Ölwaffe zur Weltmacht

printer friendly version


© 2001-2004. All rights reserved.
No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission.

(mails to the webmaster)