|
Democratic Republic of
Congo
The peace agreement will be implemented despite disruptive acts and
atrocious crimes in East Congo
by Joseph M. Kyalangilwa, President of the Civil Society of South
Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo *
Congolese who really love their country can nothing but welcome all
the settlements of the inter-Congolese agreement, which emerged from
more than 19 months of hard struggle at the inter-Congolese peace
discussions. These are the results of a long process whose stations were
Gaberone (Botswana), Addis Abbeba (Ethiopia), Sun City (South Africa)
and finally Pretoria and again Sun City.
The agreements are now going to be implemented. Their main
instrument is the new Congolese transitional constitution of 4th April
2003, which was put into force by the current head of state and head of
government, Joseph Kabila, who, true to his promises after his
inauguration on 26th January 2001, set in motion the realization of the
peace treaties. On 7th April President Kabila was sworn in on the
constitution as transitional president before the highest court of
justice. With his actions the Congolese head of state started off the
process of peace settlements and democratization in our country and all
Congolese, who rightfully call themselves Congolese and are committed
to a real peace in Congo, are pleased and encouraged by the obvious
determination of their president to give the Congolese peoples – after
the period of transition – the opportunity, in democratic and
transparent elections, to decide which women and men they want to
entrust with the offices of the newly created Third Republic. In
contrast to what non-Congolese press agencies say, although they should
know better, these will be the third and not the second free elections
in the history of Congolese independence
Free elections to be held soon
From 20th April 2003 onward, all the other transitional institutions
in Kinshasa will take up their work, in particular the government of
the broad national unity, in which representatives of all participants
of the inter-Congolese peace dialogue have a seat: the government, the
opposition (civil society, Mayi-Mayi and rebel movements), the national
assembly and the senate.
Soon further institutions will also take up their work, which are to
support the democratization process, in particular the Independent
Electoral Committee, the National Monitoring Commission for the
Compliance with Human Rights, the High Media Council, the Commission
‘Truth and Reconciliation’, the Ethical Commission for the Fight Against
Corruption and many more. The tasks and function of these institutions
needs to discussed in a later article for interested readers. I would
like to point out here, however, that all these commissions are
presided over by representatives of the Congolese civil society.
Adversaries of the democratization and peace process
Jealous of the immense natural wealth, which is available in
abundance both above and beneath eastern Congo soil, the poor
neighbours of Congo, the small countries Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda,
have created every possible scenario in order to prevent the return of
peace to Congo. This has happened despite and in flagrant violation of
all promises and agreements. Both Uganda and Rwanda signed the peace
treaty of Luanda on 10th July 1999. Both countries signed an agreement,
together with Joseph Kabila, the Congolese president at the time, on
30th July and 6th September 2002, in which the two countries committ
themselves to withdrawing their troops from the northern and eastern
territories of the Democratic Republic of Congo by the end of December
2002, troops which they had deployed there in violation of
international law. Paul Kagamé, the strong man of the present police
regime in Kigali (Rwanda), solemnly declared on 13th September 2002
before the General Assembly of the UN and in the presence of his
political protector and whisperer, George W. Bush, that within a week
the last Rwandese soldier would leave the territiory of the Democratic
Republic of Congo.
Today the Ugandan, Rwandese and Burundi troops are still in Congo,
and the international community is fully aware of this. What is the
true role of the UN soldiers who are assigned with an observation
mission in Congo (MONUC)? Are they there to count the dead until their
time is up and then supposed to shrug their shoulders when confirming
the alarming reports of the organizations of the Congolese civil
society, which are dispatched regularly throughout the world? Three
weeks ago ago Rwandese troops and Burundi troops in the Kivu were
reinforced. With what intention? We know it. In order to be able to
continue unhindered the illegal exploitation and the systematic
plundering of natural resources in Congo, the profits of which are
regularly sold off by highranking persons in Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi
to American, British, German, Canadian and other go-betweens. These
troops behave as if they were stationed in an occupied country and
trample with impunity on all the human rights of the suffering
population. While the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo
has gone about implementing the peace settlements, troops of these
three aggressor countries executed on 3rd April this year 966 people in
a summary law suit in the city of Drodo near Bunia (district Ituri in
the eastern province, in the border area with Sudan and Uganda) and
buried them in mass graves. The traces of blood are still wet and MONUC
eagerly questions witnesses. The victims are obviously members of the
ethnic group of the Hema, who were killed by Ugandan troops and whose
corpses were thrown into 20 mass graves. Now Rwandese troops are
marching towards positions of the Ugandans in the proximity of Bunia.
These two countries have already fought each other twice on Congolese
soil, in Kisangani, mainly over the control of diamond mines. The next
battle will be over the control of the gold mines in Kilo Moto and of
large oil fields, which were recently discovered around Lake Albert and
which lie on Congolese territory, near the border with Uganda. And for
similar reasons soldiers of the RCD Goma (rebel formation) fought
against ‘false’ Mayi-Mayi rebels, among them the ‘Mundundu-40’ group
(obviously supported by Paul Kagamé), on 6 April 2003 from about 2.30
until 11 p.m. in the city of Bukavu. On 8th April 2003, the outcome of
these battles was 26 dead, among them 13 civilians (among them a
Protestant minister), 4 members of the RCD Goma and 9 of the
Mundundu-40-militia. In addition, there were 54 injured persons. On
Monday, 7th April 2003 peace obviously prevailed in Bukavu. However,
business and offices remained closed. In the meantime, rumours say that
the aggressors of Mudundu-40 were pursued on the road to Mwenga near
the village of Mugogo in the Walungu territory. We add that not only
the victims had to suffer but members of the RCD Goma, who are
supported by and under the command of Rwandese officers, plundered and
destroyed the Catholic municipality of Ciriri.
* * *
P.K. Eastern Congo is not being
allowed to find peace, otherwise someone would put a stop to the dirty
job of the looters of neighbouring countries and their backers in the
west! And all of this is taking place before the UN monitoring troop’s
very eyes, whose job it is to secure the precarious peace. In the face
of its own weakness it is impotent and is more concerned at being able
to protect itself! Added to this, there is the international community
which stoically takes note of the different cries for help from the
region, and then carefully files them away in their correct place on
the shelf together with other evidence of human depravity. And all this
has been taking place at a time when ‘the protecting power of the west’
was bombing other people into the Stone Age because their government,
former CIA agents, no longer did what the only remaining superopower
wanted them to. We have Indeed come far in this world!
* 1982-1987 Member of the regional
council in Kivu
|
 |
|