|
Joe Sobran’s Column
Patriotism, Mom, and the Bums
by Joe Sobran, Washington D.C.
War always seems to bring out a certain kind of patriotism we’d be
better off without: the ’love it or leave it’ variety. A lot of people
assume that patriotism means supporting any war your government chooses
to get into — or, in this case, any war your president even wants to
get into. Some people took it even further, hoping for an even bigger
war than President Bush had in mind.
One reader wrote to me that if he had his way, we’d have ‘nuked
Damascus, Baghdad, Tehran, and, for good measure, Paris.’ He also called
the Iraq war ‘the best thing that has happened for world peace since
Hiroshima!’
This is, fortunately, an extreme example. But it does illustrate a
common deformity of patriotism — the way love for your own country can
turn into hatred of other people’s countries.
Naturally, opponents of the war found their patriotism questioned.
Wanting peace was called ‘anti-American.’ It seems to me that equating
loving America with desiring war might be rather unpatriotic, but I
won’t insist on the point.
My own view is that people are naturally patriotic. It’s normal to
love your homeland. You almost can’t help it, in the same way you almost
can’t help loving your family.
I was recently re-reading one of my favorite books, The Four Loves
by C.S. Lewis. Lewis discusses patriotism in his chapter on affection,
the love of the familiar just for being familiar. Affection is the
humblest form of love: you feel it for your dog, your old neighbor,
your home, just because they are yours, not because they are
particularly excellent. You are apt to feel affection without realizing
it; it sneaks up on you over time and grows gradually. You may become
aware of it only with loss or separation.
You can love your country without approving of its government. This
is the hardest part for some people to understand. Bill Clinton once
told us, ‘You can’t love your country and hate your government.’ You
most certainly can. Many perfectly patriotic Americans found Clinton
himself loathsome, disgusting, and shameful. It was because they loved
their country that they hated having him symbolize it to the world.
Some people feel the same way about President Bush.
Patriotism shouldn’t be confused with national pride. Loving your
country is like loving your mother. You needn’t feel she is the
greatest mother in the world in order to love her; the fact that she is
your mother is sufficient. And insulting other people’s mothers won’t
earn you much of a reputation for loving your own.
And you keep loving your father even when you come to realize that
maybe he can’t beat up all the other fathers in the neighborhood; or
that even if he could, you might not love him any better for that.
America is as preeminent in the world today as Rome was in her day.
This may be a matter of pride for Americans, but it is no reason for
patriotism. We would love our country even if she were weak and
insignificant on the world stage. We love her for many things, but is
her power really one of them? I hope not.
That’s why the recent jeering at France for losing so many wars was
so unbecoming. French defeats might be a topic of comedy and
good-natured raillery, but they are hardly grounds for contempt, except
in the minds of bullies. And too many Americans have shown such minds
lately. They were really admitting that they wouldn’t love their own
country if she’d had the misfortune to lose wars.
Our slogan should be not ‘My country, right or wrong,’ but ‘My
country, win or lose.’ That’s real loyalty. It was shown by the New
Yorkers who rooted for the Dodgers, their beloved ‘Bums’, through the
long years when the Yankees were always winning the World Series and
the Dodgers were taunted for losing. Remember ‘Brooklyn? Is Brooklyn
still in the league?’
When the Dodgers finally won their first Series in 1955, their fans
felt a joy inconceivable to those who had always rooted for the Yanks.
And even today, aging baseball lovers admire the old Dodger fans.
There’s a lesson there for all of us.
|