|
The Sunshine Project news
release, 8 May 2003
US Army Patents Biological Weapons Delivery System Violates
Bioweapons Convention
The United States Army has developed and patented a new grenade that
it says can be used to wage biowarfare. This is in violation of the
Biological Weapons Convention, which explicitly prohibits development
of bioweapons delivery devices.
|
Excerpt from US Patent 6,523,478
Rifle launched non lethal cargo dispenser
Application Date:
September 10, 2001, Issued February 25, 2003
Inventors: Gonzalez;
Noel (Oviedo, FL); Hartman; Daniel J. (Orlando, FL); Rouse; William G.
(Haure De Grace, MD); Malecki; Raymond J.(Perry Hall, MD); Morgan; Paul
W. (Altamonte Springs, FL)
Assignee: The United
States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army
(Washington, DC)
Abstract
A rifle muzzle launched projectile having a launch tube
defining an interior cavity, and having an opening at one end with an
inner diameter sized to fit over the end of a rifle muzzle; a bullet
trap located in the launch tube cavity; and a payload assembly mounted
on the launch tube. The payload assembly is further configured for
safely releasing a payload in a controlled manner. The payload assembly
also includes a casing for retaining an aerosol composition; a
propellant located in the casing; a primer for igniting the propellant;
and a frangible portion of the casing in contact with the aerosol
composition.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A rifle muzzle launched payload delivering projectile,
comprising:
(a) a launch tube defining an interior cavity, and having an
opening at one end with an inner diameter sized to fit over the end of
a muzzle of a rifle;
(b) a bullet trap fixedly located in said launch tube cavity
opposite from the launch tube opening, said bullet trap adapted for
safely capturing a bullet fired from said muzzle; and
(c) a payload assembly mounted on said launch tube opposite
from said opening end, said payload assembly further configured for
safely releasing a payload associated therewith in a controlled manner
during delivery in absence of shrapnel formation or fragmentation, and
wherein said payload assembly further comprises:
(i) a casing having a distal end and a proximal end, said
casing defining a chamber adapted for retaining an aerosol composition;
(ii) a propellant housed in a reservoir in said casing for
generating an expandable gas into said chamber upon ignition thereof;
(iii) a primer for igniting said propellant; and
(iv) a frangible portion of said casing in contact with the
aerosol composition, said frangible casing portion adapted for safely
rupturing in a controlled manner under pressure generated by said
propellant after ignition, whereby an aerosol cloud is expelled and
released into the atmosphere there from.
2. The projectile of claim 1, further comprising:
a gas channeling assembly extending longitudinally within said
chamber in communication with said propellant reservoir for regulating
the flow of the gas radially outward there along into said chamber; and
said frangible casing portion extending radially around said casing for
radial expulsion of said aerosol composition.
3. The projectile of claim 2, wherein the gas channeling
assembly further comprises: a tubular member extending longitudinally
from the propellant reservoir into the aerosol composition chamber,
said tubular member adapted for providing fluid communication between
the propellant reservoir and the chamber during operating; a plurality
of radially directed pores disposed in surface of said tubular member;
and a thin film surrounding and in contact with said tubular member.
4. The projectile of claim 1, wherein the payload is selected
from the group consisting of an aerosol composition, electronic
devices, unmanned aerial vehicles, flash bang munitions, sting balls,
concussion grenades, and explosive devices.
5. The projectile of claim 4, wherein the aerosol composition
is further selected from the group consisting of smoke, crowd control
agents, biological agents, chemical agents, obscurants, marking agents,
dyes and inks, chaffs and flakes. […]
Quelle: www.uspto.gov
|
|
US Patent #6,523,478, granted on February 25th 2003, covers a
‘rifle-launched non-lethal cargo dispenser’ that is designed to deliver
aerosols, including - according to the patent’s claims - ‘crowd control
agents, biological agents, [and] chemical agents …’
The development of biological weapons delivery devices is absolutely
prohibited - ‘in any circumstance’ - by Article I of the 1972
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, to which the U.S. is a party.
There is no exemption from this prohibition, neither for defensive
purposes nor for so called non-lethal agents.
‘The development of weapons for biological payloads produces great
uncertainty about the US commitment to the Biological Weapons
Convention,’ says Edward Hammond of the Sunshine Project U.S. ‘Thirty
four years after the US renunciation of biological weapons, the
Pentagon is back in the bioweapons business.’
‘Hans Blix might have an easier time finding illegal weapons if he
were inspecting near Baltimore instead of Baghdad,’ says biologist Jan
van Aken from the Sunshine Project Germany, referring to the fact that
two of the inventors work at the Army’s Edgewood Arsenal north of
Baltimore, Maryland. Other inventors work at an engineering firm in
Orlando, Florida, where the US Special Forces operate from MacDill Air
Force Base.
This grenade is yet another indication of prohibited biological and
chemical weapons development projects in the US. It stands in a row
with an illegal chemical weapons program focusing on so called
non-lethal agents (see below), uncovered last September by the Sunshine
Project, with research activities on material degrading microorganisms
by the US armed forces (see below), and with a range of questionable
biodefense activities that may well suit offensive purposes (see New
York Times, 4 September 2001).
Eroding Prohibition
So-called non-lethal weapons are blurring the lines between
permissable and illegal weapons research. The Army says the new grenade
is for the dispersal of ‘non-lethal’ agents. Claims are the legally
crucial and most carefully crafted part of a patent. The Army is fully
aware of its obligations under the BWC, yet a new bioweapons device was
patented. This underscores why ‘non-lethal’ weapons pose such a serious
threat. The Pentagon now considers bioweapons work that has been off
limits for three decades to be acceptable - if the word ‘non-lethal’ is
appended. But not only do many ‚non lethal’ agents violate treaties
themselves, it is worse: US ‘non-lethal’ research is creating and
testing hardware that can deliver the full spectrum of biological and
chemical weapons.
Pre-emptive Diplomacy
US diplomatic-military policy coordination on ‘non-lethal’ weapons
can be seen in its firm resistance to efforts to place the subject on
the international arms control agenda. In September 2002, US diplomats
vetoed the Sunshine Project’s accreditation to a Chemical Weapons
Convention meeting because the Project wanted to discuss ‘non-lethal’
chemical (and biological) weapons. Last week, US diplomats again
pre-empted discussion of ‘non-lethal’ weapons, when they blocked the
International Committee of the Red Cross from making a speech at the
Chemical Weapons Convention Review Conference.
‘This grenade is another example of how the Pentagon’s so called
‚non lethal’ weapons programs are consistently chipping away at
restrictions on two of the most deadly kinds of arms, biological and
chemical weapons. Programs that develop so called non-lethal chemical
and biological weapons should simply be abolished,’ says Hammond.
Source: www.sunshine-project.org
Commentary
Stop the Thief!
by Moritz Nestor, Switzerland
Using an enormous lie, the US have been trying to lead the
world by the nose to make their attack on Iraq look like an act of
‘defense’: they claimed that Iraq had ‘weapons of mass destruction’.
Those who know how wars are made never seriously expected that the
‘smoking gun’ would really be found! Instead, a country has been bombed
back into the Stone Age, thousands upon thousands of people have been
killed or wounded, for millions of years the country has been
contaminated with uranium dust from western nuclear power plants, and
its cultural heritage has been destroyed. And now the US are sitting in
the Middle East controlling the former Iraqi oil wells! The ‘liberators’
are handing over the country in an anarchic state: in broad daylight
people are executed by firing squad while Anglo-American soldiers stand
by shrugging their shoulders: It’s not my business! Arms trafficking is
flourishing. After 8 p.m. nobody dares to go out because of armed
fighting between rival groups. But also during the day there are
shootings so that sick persons do not dare to go to hospital, and there
are no medicines for those who do come. Please note, this situation has
been produced (and is being maintained) with the cynical explanation
that those responsible wanted to trace ‘weapons of mass destruction,’
which were threatening the world.
A report has now shown where the ‘smoking gun’ is really to be
found: in the hands of the Americans! The US-Army had long planned the
deployment of chemical and biological weapons and disregard the 1972
Biological Weapons Convention, which was also signed by them: one day
before the 11 September attacks the US Army Secretary Thomas White,
former board member of the scandal-plagued company Enron, filed an
application for a patent on a grenade which could be used to wage
biological and chemical warfare. Such weapons are ‘in any
circumstances’ prohibited by Article I of the 1972 Biological Weapons
Convention. According to US Patent No 6,523,478 this grenade was
patented on 25 February 2003 and thus the Biological Weapons Convention,
which is international law, was openly breached.
This is utter cynicism: the grenade is euphemistically called
a ‘non lethal weapon’! The US is therefore trying to prevent any public
international discussion of their ‘non lethal weapons’: in 2002 experts
of the Sunshine Project were prevented from appearing at a meeting of
the signatory states of the Chemical Weapons Convention, because
Sunshine intended to discuss those ‘non-lethal’ chemical and biological
weapons. Three weeks ago US diplomats blocked the International
Committee of the Red Cross from making a speech at the Chemical Weapons
Convention Review Conference in The Hague.
The world was considered stupid: in December 2001- the weapon
had been developed and the patent applied for (!)- the 1972 Biological
Weapons Convention was re-negotiated in Geneva in order to make it
tighter. The U.S. participated as a matter of form. In a loudmouthed
way they warned of the ‘international terrorism’, and US president Bush
senior even demanded a tightening of the international Biological
Weapons Convention! After weeks of discussions the US delegation
refused any further discussion, and have continued to do so until
today! In reality they never intended to prohibit their own biological
weapon production! For that reason the performance proved useful, in
order to wage a war. Edward Hammond of the Sunshine Project U.S. says,
‘Thirty-four years after the U.S. renunciation of biological weapons,
the Pentagon is back in its bioweapon business.’ This grenade is
another indication of the current biological and chemical weapons
development projects in the US. Already last September the Sunshine
Project uncovered further questionable U.S. army projects which display
strong offensive character. That occurrence is highly explosive. With
the development of such ‘non lethal weapons’ the U.S. are intentionally
blurring the lines between permissible and illegal weapons research. In
this way the prohibition of biological weapons becomes wastepaper.
‘This grenade is another example of how the Pentagon’s so
called ‘non lethal’ weapons programs are consistently chipping away at
restrictions on two of the most deadly kinds of arms, biological and
chemical weapons. Programs that develop so called non-lethal chemical
and biological weapons should simply be abolished,’ Hammonds demands.
We follow this demand: The US fear nothing more – as those
callous covering up tactics show - than the light of the public. Such
violations of international law and planning of crimes against humanity
have to be condemned in public and stopped by widespread protests.
|
 |
|