Another Form of Neo-colonialism
Genetically modified seeds in Africa
by Joseph Kyalangilwa, President of the Civil Society of
Southern Kivu Province and Chairman of the International
Great Lakes Forum
Do we really need genetically modified plants for our food
autarky in Africa? We believe not.
Analysing the motives of the architects of genetically
modified products and their advertising campaigns, which
they loudly proclaim from the platforms of international
organizations, we get to know that with the help of
genetically modified (GM) seeds harvest yield will increase,
even if a smaller area of land is cultivated, and a crop can
be harvested several times a year.
With regard to our situation in Africa, we still have
enormous areas of land which can be cultivated, on which we
can produce sufficient food supplies even without the use of
fertilizers. The problem of the shortage of food in Africa
can never be solved by the obligation to grow genetically
modified plants or by western countries donating surplus
food to Africa.
Consequences of GM seeds in the developing countries
GM seeds are produced in western countries. Even if the
yield per hectare is considerably high, a selection of new
seeds cannot be taken from GM seeds. Thus, the farmers
become unavoidably dependent on new GM seeds, which are only
offered by western companies. This results in total
dependence on western suppliers and their prices, which –as
is also the case with medicines – will make the poorest even
poorer and the richest even richer.
If GM seeds are sold to the developing countries and GM
food is distributed as donations, then we remain extremely
sceptical in Africa – even if the suppliers insist on their
harmlessness for the health of the consumers.
Moreover, the transport costs for these seeds and for the
western food donations represent more than 50% of the total
costs. This is a further way of providing profits to the
European transport companies, which have been especially
established for this purpose, and at the same time it
guarantees numerous jobs in these countries.
For us only that food which is produced naturally and
which corresponds with our eating habits is healthy. These
foodstuffs can certainly be improved, varied and made more
balanced.
How can Africa achieve food autarky?
First of all western leaders must stop causing futile and
senseless wars in the developing countries. The so-called
developing countries have the good and bad luck to possess
immense natural resources, which the industries of the
western powers urgently need. Among others, these are oil,
diamonds, gold, copper, uranium, cobalt, iron, tin, coltan,
agricultural products and timber, etc. Aggression,
occupation and the illegal exploitation of raw materials
can, for example, be witnessed in Iraq, in South Sudan, in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in Sierra Leone, in
Liberia, along the Ivory Coast, in Angola and in Nigeria.
This is often instigated by the remaining tiny neighbouring
countries afflicted by poverty, instrumentalised by the
great powers that scandalously ignore the regulations of the
UN Charter and international laws.
Although they claim that they are above international laws,
which they have however ratified, these great powers are
often quoted in various UN reports: the USA, Canada, Great
Britain, Belgium, Holland, Germany, France etc., who are the
true clients of the mischief which befalls the developing
countries. These are countries in which the life of the
autochthon population is not worth a penny. It is the great
powers who are the real beneficiaries of those natural
resources which are illegally exploited under deceitful
pretext by their helpers in other sovereign countries – a
procedure which has always been condemned by the UN, but so
far unfortunately without success.
It should be noted here that the wars, which are forced upon
the people in so many places, are part of destabilization
plans which have been developed in the greatest detail in
the laboratories of the great powers. Nothing happens
coincidentally! We, however, need the peace in order to be
able to develop harmoniously. If we could live in peace –
and we have the right to do so – this would considerably
reduce emigration from Africa. The so-called civilized
countries complain about the influx of refugees from the
poorer countries, but in reality it is the warmongers who
are responsible for this situation in Africa. Not only do
they acquire our natural resources at ridiculously low
prices, and make use of them as raw materials for their
industries, but the murderous and useless wars they provoke
at the same time provide dependable markets for the sales of
weapons and ammunition manufactured by the industries of
these western countries. The big losers are once more the
peoples of the poor countries!
As already mentioned, our countries possess sufficient land
for cultivation to ensure the natural production of food. In
certain African states, however, the cultivatable soil is
unsatisfactorily used: The Democratic Republic of the Congo,
for example, boasts 2,345,400 square kilometres, of which
only 3% is used for agriculture. A further 7% of the total
area could be used. Only 3.3% of the surface is covered by
water, whereas 60% of the country comprises forests.
In other countries however, particularly in the former
British colonies, 80% of the agricultural land is in the
hands of a handful of foreign settlers, who constitute only
one or two percent of these countries' populations. On these
extensive properties, the settlers cultivate export products
such as coffee, tea, sugarcane and tobacco, which prevent
cultivation of the urgently needed basic foodstuffs for the
local population.
The heads of state or heads of government of these
countries, as soon as they try to reclaim land that was
confiscated by the colonial regimes, are accused of being
racists, poor administrators and dictators. Former colonial
powers are convinced that such heads of government should
disappear from the political stage. At international
meetings they are made victims of slander and scorn in order
to make way for an opponent, i.e. a puppet, as soon as
possible. This happened to President Robert Mugabe in
Zimbabwe, for instance, but it applies to South Africa,
Kenya etc. as well.
Africa, like all other developing areas in the world, needs
backing and technical support for its agricultural
development programs. These programs should become a
national priority for all African governments as they
concern "independence of the stomach". In order to achieve
this, technical support needs to be concentrated on the
training of the trainers so that at the end of the support
period, when the advisors leave the country again, the
programs can continue and be developed. These programs must
place the emphasis on cultivation methods, with special
consideration given to the use of locally developed seeds
which are produced by the national agricultural research
centres. Agricultural engineers and technicians will have to
ensure that the selected seeds are available over a lengthy
period in order to prevent farmers from using seeds of
inferior quality.
In 1985, we carried out a feasibility study on rice
production with regard to a "minimum agricultural plan" in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This large-scale study
proved that if one distributed improved mountain rice seeds
to the farmers of the province Kivu in Yangambi (the
Agricultural Research Centre in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo originates from the colonial period, and
completely degenerated seeds are still used which were
distributed for the last time in 1954), the harvest of paddy
rice per hectare increased from 300 kilograms to 3000
kilograms, which is a 1000% increase over the same seed
surface. This same can be achieved with other rice types,
corn and other vitally necessary crops.
The Democratic Republic of the Congo would need 40% of its
rice production in order to feed its population; the surplus
of 60% could be exported to bring foreign currency to the
country. This program, which aimed at financing itself with
the help of a compensation fund, could unfortunately not be
fully implemented. The dictator Mobutu, who gained a dubious
reputation for himself, preferred to enrich himself and his
"political family clan" excessively with the help of public
funds originating from the incomes of mining production.
This devastating kind of management can be found in all
countries controlled by dictators who are only able to
retain power with the use of arms and by the inadmissible
support of certain western governments.
Concluding remarks
To conclude, we would like to again stress that Africa has
no need whatsoever for GM plants and that the food donations
which it receives from the developed countries and which are
distributed by international humanitarian organizations can
never be a solution for the present inadequate food
situation. What Africa needs is to regain a large part of
its agricultural land, which was seized by foreign settlers,
in order to be able to produce large quantities for export.
The African peoples must dedicate themselves to their vital
agricultural cultures. Only in this way can they guarantee
their own freedom and independence from degrading foreign
paternalism.
Agricultural development would create numerous jobs for the
native population, and, at the same time, machines could
gradually be introduced to work these crucial man-made
landscapes. The states of Africa will have to establish a
round table in order to specify both the existing
possibilities and those which must be created under the
guidance of the Organization of African States (OAS), so
that the nutritional requirements of their populations can
be met by natural and balanced foods. It is unacceptable
that countries such as Angola and the South Sudan are
supplied with GM corn by western countries, while a surplus
of naturally grown corn is produced in Benin and Togo, but
they do not have customers to buy it.
As a polytechnic scientist, I support all scientific
progress which improves man's natural living conditions.
What I will, however, never accept is the use of scientific
discoveries for commercial manipulation and the inevitable
degradation of human beings, and profit-making by exploiting
people due to their ignorance and the resultant violation of
their dignity.
|
 |
|