Israel only needs an effective pretext; then it will strike against Iran, also with nuclear weapons, drag the United States into the war, the latter also mobilising NATO
by Prof Dr Eberhard Hamer
The Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu wants war against Iran. The US oil industry and the U.S. military want the same, too. The former because of Iran’s oil reserves and because without Iran, an oil monopoly in the world cannot be enforced, the military, because the overall strategy of conquest of the Middle East remains incomplete with the two countries Iraq and Afghanistan, as long Iran, the country in between, has not been attacked and conquered. However, the form of warfare has changed, after the US’s bitter experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan. An attack on Iran with ground troops up to the occupation of parts of the country is no longer possible after the experience of Afghanistan. The occupation of the country is not the starting, but the final stage of the war. Today, combat operations are being started in a more subtle and insidious way. • For years, the Israel-controlled world press has been spreading alleged Iranian plans for nuclear armament and attacks in order to cover up that Iran is the one to be attacked. In other words, the world public is lied to by the press that the planned attack victim is in fact the aggressor, and Iran’s President is presented as a hate-filled berserk, a second Hitler, capable of any crime or act of war. In the meantime, the songs of hatred against Iran have increased continuously, for about three to four years, to convince the world public that the Iranian leadership and their system – as before Saddam Hussein – are a threat to world peace. • At the same time nuclear scientists and politicians in Iran have been targeted and killed by the Israeli Mossad, in order to destroy the defence capabilities of Iran. The killings are said to be personally ordered by Netanyahu. • From American CIA circles we learn that for the last eight months Mossad and CIA have been leading a systematic cyber war against Iran, infiltrated thousands of science, military and business computer systems in Iran by viruses such as Stuxnet to bring about self-destruction or system destruction. It became known, for example, that the Siemens computer systems deployed in the Iranian nuclear industry, were programmed to self-destruction and that a nuclear disaster could be prevented by Iranians only with some difficulty. • For half a year already, the US has been assembling the largest fleet concentration in its history around Iran and the Israeli have brought the nuclear submarines from Germany in position. Both preparations for war are certainly not without intention. • Netanyahu had wanted to wage the the war already in the spring of 2012, but was retained by Obama with difficulty until autumn as an election campaign tactical move. Now, according to the American war minister Panetta, the onset of the hot phase of the war against Iran is to be expected in September when the US President will be incapacitated (“lame duck”) just before the elections and the opposition candidate is ready for war, even according to his own election campaign statements. • Above all, however, according to Panetta, Secretary of War, the strike against Iran can only begin “after the problem Syria has been solved”. That is to say, CIA and Mossad have successfully destabilized Israel’s surrounding Arab nations in North Africa, in order not to have any disturbances from there in case of war. Syria which is allied with Iran (and Russia/China) is still not destabilized. As soon as Syria will be destabilized by the insurgents of the CIA and the Mossad as well and the government eliminated – if possible – Israel has a free northern flank and can strike to the East. These statements show that the alleged freedom movements in North Africa and Syria do not originate from their own people, but have been artificially created by the CIA and Mossad to destabilize these countries as a preparation for war. This also explains that the world press and the American government (Clinton) and their satellites, and the Israel-controlled world press blame Syria’s president for the “bloodshed” instead of their own agents and insurgents, who are provided with weapons via Turkey by Mossad and the CIA and strategically led. Thus Syria is already a pre-war to the post-war against Iran. This is also the view of the Russians and Chinese. This is why they are blocking UN resolutions for direct combat by NATO against Assad. Thus the war against Iran has long since begun – by the media, economically (boycott), militarily and as cyber-war. Only an effective pretext is needed, then Israel will strike against Iran also with nuclear weapons, drag the US into war, and the latter also mobilizing NATO. As with the first two world wars, a third world war is being built up here that cannot be avoided by Iran, while the only thing that still matters is to make Iran appear as an attacker for the world public. This is why Netanyahu – against his better judgment – immediately declared the bus attack in Romania as an Iranian act, after the sinking of an Iranian boat in the Gulf by the Americans remained without the expected response from Iran. One or the other pretexts for war will be constructed or brought about until autumn. The war against Iran, subversively begun long ago by the masterminds mentioned above, is to change the balance of power in the Orient. The manipulators cannot be stopped anymore. A third world war seems inevitable. We in Europe should not believe that this world war does not affect us, as well. The Americans will force us to participate with troops and money as they did in Afghanistan. In addition, also a dramatic rise in oil prices might have economic consequences for whole of Europe and Germany. And no one knows how Russia and China will react if their ally Iran is destroyed. However, Israel and the US could have miscalculated and even damage themselves if their war objectives – extension of power, possession of oil in Iran and the covering-up of the American and Israeli financial crises – are not achieved. Twice for the United States, a world war was a big leap from an economic crisis to the world’s leading economic power. A third time, this might fail and lead to fall if China steps in and mobilizes Islam, that is already opposed to the United States. • (Translation Current Concerns)
|